Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Moritz Kudernatsch vs Daniel Little Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kudernatsch vs Little analysis and find out who is favored!
Moritz Kudernatsch vs Daniel Little Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kudernatsch 0 - 0 Little
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kudernatsch has won 51.39% of points on his second serve, while Little has won 48.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kudernatsch, in recent form, has won 48.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Little has won 51.99%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.14% and 29.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kudernatsch has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Little has saved 63.24% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kudernatsch has won 66.67% of matches played (W/L 4/ 2), with Little winning 42.31% (W/L 11/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kudernatsch has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 67% (W/L 4/ 2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Kudernatsch has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 66.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 2), where as Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44% of matches (W/L 11/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kudernatsch has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Little has played against players with an average rank of 94.42.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kudernatsch has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Little has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kudernatsch has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Little has converted 45.9% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
N/A
Rank
High
19
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
843
Rank
564
High
27
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
57% (4-3)
Career Total W/L
56% (98-76)
67% (4-2)
YTD W/L
54% (7-6)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kudernatsch VS Little H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Moritz Kudernatsch | Daniel Little |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (4/2) | 54% (7/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 64% (9/5) | 52% (14/13) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (72/56) | 53% (135/121) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (4/2) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.17 | 0.58 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 72 |
| DFs per game | 0.1 | 0.17 |
| DFs Total | 6 | 21 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:36 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 60.69 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (114/186) | 60% (479/805) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (79/114) | 73% (351/479) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (37/72) | 48% (157/326) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (8/18) | 46% (28/61) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (67/159) | 37% (292/780) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (4/2) | 54% (7/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (4/6) | 54% (7/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (5/4) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (5/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 14% (7/1) |
Moritz Kudernatsch Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 3-6 6-2 10-1 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats 
Jacob Bradshaw
Player
Moritz Kudernatsch
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Moritz Kudernatsch
Player
Corban Crowther
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 5-7 10-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Moritz Kudernatsch
Player
Paul Ender
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Luc Fomba
Player
Daniel Little
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
30 of
49)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
24 of
37)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
51%
(
38 of
74)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
90%
(
35 of
39)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Daniel Little
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Joshua Charlton
73%
(
59 of
81)
1st Serve %
78%
(
70 of
90)
12
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
47 of
70)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
89
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-6(2) 10-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Mason Naumovski
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve %
71%
(
42 of
59)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Jimmy Yang
40%
(
23 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
65%
(
22 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Kudernatsch Vs Little Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
